Month: February 2015

The American Dream and Poverty in the U.S. by Sarah Butler

The American Dream to me is the idea that you have to be successful and have 2childrenmoney to be happy. The American Dream has many facets that change over the course of US history as well as facets that contradict each other.

There is the idea that with hard work, you can come from nothing and achieve the dream life of a happy family and successful career. The iconic Migrant Mother photograph from 1936 during the Great Depression paints a picture of poverty in the West during this time period. This photo is hard to relate to the American Dream. The mother, Florence Owens Thompson is working as a crop picker to provide her 7 children with food. This family doesn’t have a home all they have is a tent and an old car.

It is hard to relate my idea of the American Dream to this family because they are in such dire conditions. Their mother is stressed and worn down because she is unsure of where their next meal will come from. She is caring a heavy burden and wants to care for her children. Because The United States was so poor at this moment in history it was hard to pursue the American Dream without an income. Thompson could hope to achieve the American Dream but in the state she was in, as well as the state the country was in, it was more about survival than dreaming.

The problem with poverty during the Great Depression according to Dorothea Lange and Carter Revard is that it was so severe. Poverty was on a new level and when people would go to California for jobs they were met with low pay and increasing debt. This level of poverty relates to the American Dream in that the dream becomes unattainable. These people were putting in hard work with nothing in return. They were not slowly climbing the ladder to happiness through hard work. The American Dream becomes distant because during the Great Depression it is unrealistic because of the high level of poverty.

The American Dream relates to how we understand the ideas of America in the ways that America was founded. America was built on the ideal of freedom. Europeans moved to America to be free but at the same time that was a contradiction in that there were slaves and women didn’t have equal rights. This is similar to the American Dream in that the American Dream can be a contradiction. In the case of the Migrant Mother hard work didn’t lead to overall happiness and success, which is the basis of the American Dream. The American Dream is an idea that creates what America is, but its complexity has to be fully understood to find the deeper meanings of what America stands for.

Photo: http://gogetfunding.com/project/helping-families-overcome-poverty

The American Dream: A Fallacy for Some by Angie Indik

AMDreamThe American Dream is said to be attainable by anyone. Politicians boast about this notion during campaign speeches. “If you work hard enough, you will achieve your ambitions in America!” Movies throughout time, such as The Pursuit of Happiness, Cinderella, or Arthur, portray the “rags to riches” story that attract a sizable audience. Famous people like Oprah Winfrey, Steve Jobs, or Sam Walton have all come from financially meager backgrounds but they acquired great wealth in their adult lives. It is these stories, fact or fiction, that give life and hope in the American Dream. For some people, the American Dream does not have to mean huge riches. It could involve living in a comfortable home. It can entail providing necessities like food and clothing for a family along with attaining some extras like toys and the ability to take a vacation every year. This American Dream is certainly a reality for many people, but for others like Florence Owens Thompson pictured in the famous “Migrant Mother” photograph, the American Dream is an absolute fallacy.

mmThe “Migrant Mother” photo was taken by Dorothea Lange in 1936. Florence Owens Thompson is the focal point of the picture. The woman is surrounded by three of her children. Thompson carries a worried expression. Two of her children hide their faces from the camera, perhaps out of shame. The third child is an helpless infant. The photograph displays depravity. These people are wearing old, torn clothes. They appear unbathed. The message is the mother and her family are poor. This picture is iconic for not only presenting what poverty looked like in the 1930s, but because of the emotional response it received. A parent’s job is to provide necessities to his or her family and it is apparent that Thompson was unable to do so.  Lange took this picture to show the inhumanity of being one of America’s poor. For the people who were not devastated by the Depression, Lange was telling them the American Dream is not alive. The message was the system is broken and we as Americans need to do something about it. As photographer Jacob Riis brought awareness of the horrors of child labor (and poverty) around the turn of the century, Lange was doing the same with her pictures as she was exposing the degradation of poverty. Both photographers were motivating people to act.  The “Migrant Mother” was an important picture then as it is today. While America has not experienced this grand level of poverty since the Great Depression, this photograph is a reminder of the time when we did. It reinstates that poverty is real and that the notion of the American Dream does not exist for all.

 

The Political Undertones of The Wizard of Oz by Alexa Morgan Bricker

Though I hadn’t read the book as a kid, to me the movie The Wizard of b5596e939586e577cc01ff888998b69fOz seemed to be nothing more than a simple fairy tale about a girl who travels to a faraway land and meets a number of characters, ultimately learning the lesson that home is the best place to be. But now, having learned a great deal more about American history, it seems obvious that not just this story, but the majority of stories, are reflections of their time periods. I am always really fascinated to find out when the stories I grew up watching or reading have a deeper, hidden meaning, so I was excited to know The Wizard of Oz does too.

Many children’s books, both old and contemporary, are riddled with political undertones. Though some messages are more subtle than others, it is pretty evident that The Wizard of Oz is a clear reflection of the state of America’s political system at the time it was written.

Nearly every character and theme can relate directly toward the Populist movement and its players the years leading up to the publishing of the book. In his essay, Henry Littlefield argues that each beloved character and theme from the story can be linked to the environment of the late 1800 and early 1900s in America.  The scarecrow represents the farmer, fighting for the introduction of silver into the economy to boost the dollar, and the Wizard represents politicians themselves and their trickery. I find it hard for the points Littlefield makes to be no more than coincidence when everything from the silver shoes to the twister seemingly finding a tie to something in the real world.

In 1900, when the book was first published, the political and economic state of the U.S. wasn’t that bright. Money and jobs were scarce, and like we’ve seen at other points in history when times are tough, people turn to politicians to resolve the problems but are often disappointed when they realize the politicians have their own interests in mind, not those of the people. In this political cartoon originally published on Bizzaro Comics, Dorothy asks the Cowardly Lion, the Scarecrow and the Tin Man that they must be politicians since the things they “need” are a heart, brain, and courage. While not the original intent of the characters, the images of Dorothy and her crew have been utilized in new ways to reflect many different eras of political distress.2djw7du

In this more recent cartoon from Righttoons.com, big business is still depicted as sneaky and conniving and having an upper hand in the political scene over the people, just as it was depicted in in the time of The Wizard of Oz. Though it cannot be known for sure if this is the true intent of the story, it shouldn’t really matter. This story and many others have been used to better explain political affairs that may otherwise be confusing. To me, allegories are more than comical comparisons, they can be an important tool into seeing a part of society that needs to uncovered.

http://media-cache-ec0.pinimg.com/736x/b5/59/6e/b5596e939586e577cc01ff888998b69f.jpg

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_9VGZjBQHr0s/S9FeChAogoI/AAAAAAAAFAk/aqgEOo_4HhQ/s1600/2djw7du.jpg

Alternate View of OZ: The Wiz by Calvin Thrall

The image I’ve selected is a promotional poster for the 1978 musical The Wiz, an alternate take on The Wizard of Oz with an entirely African-American cast. To The-Wizunderstand why this film exists, and why the fact that it exists is relevant, we have to examine the conditions under which L. Frank Baum created the original Wizard of Oz story in the final years of the 19th century. Baum was a member of the Democratic Populist party, and in the 1890s he ardently supported Populist William Jennings Bryan in both his 1896 and 1900 presidential campaigns – obviously, both were unsuccessful (Littlefield, 49). Henry Littlefield proposes that The Wizard of Oz is an allegory for the political climate during the time Baum was writing it: Dorothy is the common citizen, the cowardly lion is Bryan, and the Wizard represents the U.S. government leadership (the emperor has no clothes). Though Bryan’s dual losses in the presidential election proved that Baum’s Populist party was in the minority, The Wizard of Oz has a happy ending, with all of the characters realizing that what they were looking for was inside themselves all along. If Littlefield is right about the allegory, we can see The Wizard of Oz as a story that Baum wrote with the intent to empower and motivate his fellow Democratic Populists to pick themselves up, dust themselves off, and perhaps be a bit smarter and braver the next time around. Baum was writing for a minority group that didn’t have the political or social clout that it desired.

Flash forward almost eight decades to the conception of The Wiz in the late 1970s. Michael Jackson and the Jackson 5 are superfamous African-American pop stars in a nation that had only been desegregated fairly recently. It would be disrespectful to say that L. Frank Baum’s Democratic Populists were ever in a situation as dire as that of African-Americans in the mid 20th century; however, enough parallels can be drawn that I believe it is fair to say that The Wizard of Oz and The Wiz were created with a similar goal – to empower and encourage a minority demographic that lacks social and political power. The Wiz feautures a Dorothy who is from Harlem, not Kansas, but both locations were chosen with the goal of appealing to the common citizen as opposed to the elite. Additionally, the Wizard himself in The Wiz turns out to actually be a failed politician, which is probably a symbol for the numerous ways that the U.S. government has failed and mistreated African-Americans throughout the country’s history. If The Wizard of Oz was an attempt to rally and reinvigorate the downtrodden and few Democratic Populists, than The Wiz was an attempt to empower African-Americans, who suffered awful injustices at the hands of the government trusted with protecting it. Both works succeed in these goals while simultaneously delivering a fun, entertaining musical.

Oz Wars by Carlee Cantwell

After our class discussions on The Wonderful Wizard of Oz and its use as an oz_wars_by_denism79-d30j2a3allegory, I got to thinking about other movies that could have employed the same method. Some further research revealed theories about Star Wars and The Wonderful Wizard of Oz being essentially the same story. Although created in completely different eras, the resemblance between the two works is startling.

Once I found out about the theory I was curious to see if any images had been created representing the story book and science fiction movie. Sure enough, I stumbled upon an artist rendering by Denis Medri of what he calls “Oz Wars.” The image depicts Dorothy walking somewhere with a Wookie, who represents the lion, a cross-over between C3P0 and the scarecrow, r2d2 as the tin man, and Toto mixed with Darth Vader.

There are two levels of similarities between these two works: the characters and the allegory they represent. The main protagonist in each story, Dorothy and Luke Skywalker, both leave their home with their Aunt and Uncle in search of something. On their journey both have a companion with them. For Dorothy, Toto takes this position and for Luke it is R2D2. The interesting part about these companions is they cannot communicate directly with the protagonist but both help move the story along.

Then there are the three companions the protagonists meet along the way. In Star Wars, Han Solo is searching for wisdom in the same way that the Scarecrow is hoping to get a brain. The Lion’s quest for courage is replicated in Chewbacca the Wookie’s search. Both also happen to be furry creatures. Finally, while the Tin Man is looking for a heart, C-3PO desires love among all things. There are also unnamed sources of evil in both stories, represented by the flying monkeys and Storm Troopers of Darth Vader’s forces.

Beyond the realm of the similarities in characters, both the story book The Wonderful Wizard of Oz and the film Star Wars, both have a secondary allegorical meaning. The Wonderful Wizard of Oz, whether intentionally or not, serves an allegory for the Populist movement in the 1890s and early 1900s. With the gold standard mimicking the Yellow Brick Road, the silver shoes showing the Populist solution to economic troubles, and the Cowardly Lion representing William Jennings Bryan among other things, there is clear evidence to the allegorical nature of the story book.

To the same tune, George Lucas the creator of Star Wars, has come out in recent years stating that the film, originally aired in 1977, was meant to represent the Vietnam War in many ways. While the film did not make it to the screen before the conclusion of the conflict, the screenwriting process took place at the height of the fighting. Many have said they can see the resemblance of Han Solo to a guerilla on the run from the Viet Kong. It also has followed suit that during most of the releases of future Star Wars films since the original film, America has been involved in some form of armed conflict, most recently in 2005 when Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith premiered during the United States controversial involvement with the war in Iraq. While L. Frank Baum may have unintentionally written about Populism and George Lucas outright says he is presenting an allegorical film, it is clear to see the similarities between these two works.

http://denism79.deviantart.com/art/Oz-Wars-182287947

“So Much Happened Before Dorothy Dropped In” by Elizabeth Yazvac

In my young twenty years of life, I have been dragged to see A Musical Christmaswicked-logo Carol on more public school field trips than any person should have to endure. But, despite these unhappy visits to the Pittsburgh Civic Light Opera, I have managed to preserve my love of musicals by way of Wicked: The Musical. Four t-shirts, one sweatshirt, two Collector’s Edition Grimmeries, one bootlegged soundtrack (oops), four shows in Pittsburgh, and one show in San Francisco later, my mother has forbidden me from purchasing more tickets to see Wicked, and has certainly stopped buying me overpriced clothing with the word “popular” on it.

I’m not sure what sparked my obsession with Wicked: The Musical, especially considering I had never been obsessed with The Wizard of Oz – the film or the book. Certainly, the cast of the Broadway production is absolutely fabulous, and the songs are ridiculously catchy, but no other musical has ever cost me (read: wicked-musicalmy mom) so much money. In addition to the powerful message of believing in yourself and the importance of knowing the whole story before making judgments, the sheer creativity and modern political allegory that warns against the power of those in charge are what makes Wicked resonate so well with audiences.

Wicked: The Musical is based off of a book (by Gregory Maguire also titled Wicked), that follows a girl named Elphaba and describes how she eventually became known as The Wicked Witch of the West. The name Elphaba is a play onfakemonkey the sounds of L. Frank Baum’s (author of original The Wonderful Wizard of Oz) initials – LFB. This is only one of literally hundreds of references to The Wonderful Wizard of Oz, the children’s book that Wicked is based upon. Wicked opens as the townspeople of Oz are rejoicing in the death of The Wicked Witch of the West. Glinda The Good Witch arrives (traveling via bubble) and tells the townspeople that they should not be so quick to hate the Wicked Witch, and reveals that a long time ago she was friends with The Wicked Witch, whose name was Elphaba. The rest of the musical is a flashback to Glinda and Elphaba’s time at Shiz University.

Wicked: The Musical is full of creative reimagination, and this helps transform the message of The Wonderful Wizard of Oz into a message that resonates with today’s audiences, although the underlying theme of being hesitant to trust those in power remains. For example, Elphaba’s sister Nessarose receives a pair of silver slippers as a gift. Later in the musical, Elphaba enchants the slippers, turning them red. In this way, the slippers pay homage to both the original book and the film (the book had silver slippers, and the film had ruby red ones). Another interesting example of this re-imagination is the flying monkeys. In Wicked, Elphaba is told to cast a spell to prove her magical abilities, not knowing what the spell will do to the monkey she is casting upon. After successfully completing the spell, she realizes in horror that she has caused all the monkeys in the room to painfully and permanently sprout wings.

Many other characters and plot elements play on the original universe created in The Wonderful Wizard of Oz, and this makes watching Wicked a much richer experience for audiences who are familiar with the story of The Wizard of Oz. Although the political messages are much more apparent in the book Wicked, they are also present in the musical. Animals (with a capital A) can talk, until they are stripped of their speaking abilities, and put in cages “where they belong.” Plot elements like this are a way to translate the old allegory of populism into a modern-day political message. Audiences today wouldn’t pick up on allegory about the silver standard, so the transformation of the story to, instead, send messages warning against the subjugation of groups or the trickery of those in power makes Wicked just as powerful as the original, while still maintaining the underlying theme of distrust in government. By using both the themes found in the original L. Frank Baum book and 1939 film, as well as themes for today’s audience, Wicked is definitely a mix of the best from the old and the new.

Wicked Poster: The Image Kid. http://imgkid.com/wicked-the-musical-logo.shtml

Flying Monkey: “Trouble in Oz?” The Upstager: all the world’s an upstage. 1 April 2014. https://theupstager.wordpress.com/2010/04/01/trouble-in-oz/

Elphaba and Galinda: Mitchell, Keri. “Want to see ‘Wicked’? Buy tickets now!” Advocate. 15 January 2013. http://lakewood.advocatemag.com/2013/01/15/want-to-see-wicked-buy-tickets-now/