General Assembly Meeting

Paley Library Lecture Hall
September 21, 2004
2:00 PM

Present: J. Baldwin, C. Bell, C. Brigham, C. Davis Cunningham, M. Edsall, G. Fowler, S. Golding, A. Goldstein, A. Harlow, M. Jerrido, L. Lane, C. Lang, J. LeBreton, R. Lezenby, G. McKinney, D. Murray, P. Myers, B. Schoolar, G. Sneff, S. Stormont, K. Szigeti, M. Thomas, S. Thompson, T. Whitehead, B. Wright

Guests: B. Cho, L. Gordon, J. Linwood, D. Overfield, R. Sieber, R. Spaulding, G. Zoller

Chairperson Greg McKinney called the meeting to order at 2:05 pm.

1. Minutes of the General Assembly Meeting of May 2004 were approved.
2. Elections: Carol Brigham, Chair of Nominations and Elections, asked for nominations from the floor for the Chair of the Continuing Education Committee and for the PARA committee. There were none. Ballots were collected.
3. Report from Jonathan LeBreton:
   1. Vice Provost search: The first interview for a candidate for the Vice Provost for Libraries and Director of Paley Library has been scheduled for September 29 th and 30 th, 2004. The identity of the candidate has not yet been released, nor do we know how many candidates will be interviewed. We are all encouraged to attend the candidate’s presentation and prepare questions for the meeting with library staff. The presentation will be given in Paley’s lecture hall. Since we hope for a large turnout, it will probably be crowded.
   2. Budget: In fiscal year 05, we were allocated an additional 8% to the library budget to cover inflation in the price of tangible (not electronic) library records. This comes to approximately $290,000. While this does not address all of our inflationary needs, it does indicate that the university administration acknowledges the problem that inflation causes with our budget.

      The narrative portion of this year’s Temple University budget states that there will be an increase to our budget of 1.4 million dollars. The money has not actually been allocated yet; it will probably happen when a Vice Provost is hired, and it will be shared with Law and the Health Sciences Libraries.

   3. Message of encouragement: We have been doing a terrific job moving forward under extraordinary circumstances; we need to continue doing what we’ve been doing, so that in the spring with the support of the university and a new VPL, we will do even better.

      A question was asked about the 1.4 million dollar budget increase. Jonathan clarified that it is for materials, but noted that it would relieve pressure on other parts of the budget, such as staff and equipment. He also noted that a part would be consumed by inflation.

      A question was asked about incorrect vacation and sick time appearing on our pay stubs. HR is working on the problem, but has given no time frame for a resolution. To have yours corrected, start with the libraries’ Administrative Services to ensure that the information we provide is correct. Jonathan will be bringing the matter up with Deborah Hartnett in October when they meet.

1. Election results:
   • Continuing Education Committee (Chair): David Dillard
   • PARA : Rick Lezenby & Barbara Wright

Carol Brigham thanked all who were willing to run for these committees.

1. New business:
   1. AAL Website: Carol Brigham reported that the AAL website is missing many pages and has a number of broken links. She is working on the problem and will send out an announcement when she thinks it is fixed.
   2. Introductions: Jenifer Baldwin introduced Gabriela Zoller, Reference intern, and Susan Golding, the Government Documents Librarian. Mary Edsall introduced Robert Spaulding, Philadelphia Dance Collection intern. Margaret Jerrido introduced Rick Sieber and Dan Overfield , Urban Archives interns. Jonathan LeBreton introduced Brooke Cho, Director of Development. Gretchen Sneff introduced Kathy Szigeti, Science Librarian for Biology, Chemistry, and Computer Science. Sandi Thompson introduced Larissa Gordon, Ambler Library intern. Tom Whitehead introduced Judith Linwood, Special Collections intern.
   3. Library Prize for Research: Gretchen Sneff announced to the General Assembly a new program that has received support and funding from the Provost’s office. It is an opportunity to promote the use of the Libraries’ collections by undergraduates. Students can submit an application describing the research process they used to complete an assignment for a Temple University for credit course and additional information which will be judged by a panel of faculty and librarians. Up to three $1000 prizes will be awarded. The program was modeled after one at the University of California, Berkeley.

1. Old Business:

Membership in AAL: A discussion was carried over from last year concerning the eligibility of Temple University Libraries staff members who are not employed as librarians for membership in AAL. The relevant section of the bylaws was included on the agenda and read aloud. The Steering Committee felt that the issue was adequately explained in the bylaws and asked for members to speak if any felt the bylaws needed to be changed. Some members felt that the bylaws could be strengthened by further clarification of the term “professional librarian” but it was ultimately decided to postpone any changed until after the bylaws are reviewed by the new Vice Provost for Libraries.

The meeting was adjourned at 3:10 p.m.

Submitted by,

Carla Davis Cunningham

1. Minutes approved as amended.
2. J. LeBreton offered commendations to AAL for developing this particular program and thanks for work done by librarians and ADC.  No announcement has been made yet of the appointment of an interim University Librarian, but library business continues in a competent and professional manner.  Librarians are encouraged to read the ADC and RIS minutes.  The library is moving forward with more strategic planning that will be done this spring, along with all of the administrative groups on campus.
3. Discussion:  AAL information on the web.  Public or private?
   A concern was raised that even if AAL information is made public, that it should also be made evident and easy to find.  The question was raised whether or not certain areas could be made public and others remain secured.  For example, could the minutes be private, but procedures and policies public.    J. LeBreton has been asked about our procedures for promotion, rank, and tenure.  All agreed that procedures and policies of the website can be made public.  The discussion will be continued in the next meeting because there is not a forum here today.
4. Other Business – G. Sneff – The General Education proposal in the Faculty Senate will be voted upon this month.  All faculty who want to amend the proposal must submit their proposals in writing.  A committee will be appointed to advise administration in searches for administrative positions.  The projected implementation date is 2005 or 2006.

Mr. Davis discussed how articulation, relaxation, and projection are essential in oral communication.   The more dynamic a speaker is, the more clearly the message is communicated.   However, this does not necessarily mean that a speaker needs to be loud.  Articulation, variety in pitch, good use of inflection, and gesture make a speech memorable and exciting.  Mr. Stanton discussed the stress of speaking in a public situation, and ways to overcome this stress.   The group was given tongue tickler exercises.   The physical mechanism of the jaws, tongue, lips, soft palate, and throat were described, as well as how to develop the muscles involved.  Breathing was discussed: the proper way to breathe was described, and exercises for breathing were given.  Exercises for releasing tension were also described and then tried by the whole group.  Techniques for adding variety and interest to public speaking were discussed and demonstrated, including variations in pitch, rhythm, and gesture.

1. Chair S. Thompson brought the meeting to order at 2:10, welcoming us to the new year and to our speaker, Catherine Fiorello.
2. Minutes of the meeting of November 2003 were approved as amended.
3. Staff Recognition Award  (C. Lang) – Reminder to nominate staff members for the award, and to write the nominations well.  Nominations should be submitted by early February.
4. Library Book Club Announcement (M. Jerrido) – “The Secret Life of Bees” is the book that the Book Club is reading together.  The Library Book Club meets on Thursdays 1:10-1:50, and all are invited to attend.  The next book will be “The Color of Water” by James McBride, in conjunction with the “One Book One Philadelphia” program.
5. Announcement – In commemoration of the Brown vs. Board of Ed. 50th Anniversary, a presentation/forum from University Libraries will be given.
6. Interim Library Director  – J. LeBreton was asked if anything has been heard about the library interim director.  Administrative Council is still meeting to take care of library business.  Comments, questions, concerns should go to the department heads or to the administrative office.  Anything of concern should be discussed at the Administrative Office, with the department head, or ADC.

The Assembly had a break for refreshments, which was followed by a presentation from Catherine Fiorello, from the Department of Psychological Studies at the College of Education.

Understanding Learning Styles 

Catherine Fiorello led a discussion on learning styles and how to apply this knowledge to more effectively communicate with library patrons in individual consultation situations as well as in the classroom.  Many different theories exist because often this phenomenon is self-reported. The students themselves say how they think they do better, but this can be their own perception and is not necessarily substantiated by empirical research.  For example, students will report that they study better with music playing in the background, but tests may show that they do better studying in silence. Another example is that if students are asked if they learn better with a videotape or lecture, they will often respond that they prefer a videotape because they prefer  not to listen to a lecture even though they may learn better that way.

However, most individuals have innate strengths and weaknesses in learning, which can be visual, auditory, or tactile.  However, only students that have a learning disability are tested for these strengths or weaknesses.  So, in a classroom, multisensory learning is the goal.  Setting up projects so that the students are doing a variety of tasks, such as some lectures, some papers, some projects, and some group projects is an effective strategy.  This way the instructor can involve most people’s strengths and at the same time can compensate for those with weaknesses.  But, for those with disabilities, this may be still be a problem.  For example, a teacher who keeps talking while turning around and writing on the board would not be understood by a student with an auditory disability.  Multisensory education not only helps those with weaknesses, but also provides reinforcement for those students who are normal.  Also, keep in mind that students who have English as a second language are not served well with only the lecture format.  They need supporting printed materials.

Specifically, in helping students work with computers, simply telling them about how to use a computer is not effective.  Such instruction must be visual and tactile.   The most helpful approach is have the student perform the work on the computer while the instructor watches and tells him what to do.  It is best for the student to hear, see, and touch.

Other topics covered were assessing the level of prior knowledge, and motivating students to learn a new skill.  Quickly assessing the level of prior knowledge in each individual patron is important in order to match the instructional level to the level of prior knowledge.  Conveying to students that new skills need to be learned is important for providing motivation.   The social skills of the librarian during the reference interview are crucial here.  The librarian needs to be seen as both teacher and helper.

1. Veterans Day – S. Thompson gave special thanks to veterans and library families with veterans.
2. Other Business –The AAL Website has been updated.  All minutes are posted.
3. Minutes of the General Assembly Meeting of September 9, 2003 were approved as amended.
4. Report of University Librarian (C. Lang for M. Pastine)
   F. Immler was given some funds to offset some of this year’s cancellations.
5. Faculty Senate Representative Report.  (L.Lane for G. Sneff)
6. Introductions
   G. McKinney introduced two librarians who are new to Temple University.

   Jenifer Baldwin began October 6th as the department head for Reference and Instructional Services, bringing an impressive array of qualifications and experience.   She previously has worked at Drexel University as the team leader for Information Literacy and Subject Specialist in the areas of art, design, and architecture.  Prior to her work at Drexel, Jenifer worked in the Reference Department of Van Pelt Library of the University of Pennsylvania.  At one time, Jenifer also had her own collectibles business, and worked for Borders Books specializing in rare and out-of-print books.   Jenifer has also worked at the Carnegie Institute in Pittsburgh and has studied film production.  Currently, in addition to serving as the Department Head for Reference here at Temple, Jenifer teaches the Resources in the Social Sciences class at Drexel University’s College of Information Science and Technology.

   David Murray came to Temple University Libraries on September 22nd as a Reference Librarian and Subject Specialist in History.  Prior to coming to Temple, David worked as a Reference Librarian at Pierce College.  He is a native of Pittsburgh and did graduate work at the University of New Mexico where he earned his Masters in Mesoamerican Studies, specializing in the Amazon and Mayan civilizations.  David has previously held positions at the Carnegie Library in Pittsburgh and at the Albequerque Public Library.  David likes science fiction, especially Star Trek.

   The Academic Assembly of Librarians welcomes Jenifer and David to Temple University Libraries.

7. Semi-Social Committee – S. Thompson mentioned restarting the library’s Semi-social Committee, to provide a way for librarians to get to know one another on an informal basis.
8. Librarians’ Travel Policy – J. Le Breton will send to the listserv information about the travel policy.
9. Mentor program for new librarians – This program will provide an opportunity for Temple librarians to provide help to new librarians at Temple if needed, and is intended to be an informal way of librarians helping each other.  Anyone who is interested in the Mentor program please contact a Steering Committee member.
10. New Business – S. Stormont suggested that the AAL webpage should include a listing of interesting projects that Temple Librarians are doing.
11. BrownBag Lunches are to begin again.  M. Edsall has offered to organize these and to take notes.  The intention is for the lunches to be an open forum and to foster interdepartmental communication.
12. Reminder – Merit applications are due soon.
13. Forum – A. Harlow “The Art of Presenting: Tips and Tricks from the Performing Arts.”
    Anne Harlow gave a presentation on practical techniques for public speaking for librarians from the fields of music, dance, and theater.  This presentation is part of one that she will give on Friday, November 14th for the Southeastern Pennsylvania Library Association.

    Presentations, Harlow said, in some ways are like plays, and the creator of the presentation is both actor and playwright.  All presenters, in order to be successful, must know the needs of the people in the audience and address the speech to their needs. Creating a presentation must begin with having clear objectives.

    Presentations have three main parts, just like many plays have three acts.  “Act I” is the Introduction, “Act II” is the body of the presentation, and “Act III” is the conclusion.   Essential components of each part of a presentation were examined.   In “Act I”, the introduction, the audience will meet the characters, get the background, and see the plot set in motion.  Good techniques for getting the audience’s attention are stories, an amazing situation, references to the audience’s specific situation, a controversial comment, an arresting visual, a particularly relevant funny joke, or even a horror story. The introduction must define the subject of the presentation, how the subject will be addressed, and convince the audience that they should care.   The body of the speech, “Act II”, must have a clear organizational structure, which can be problem/solution, good news/bad news, chronological, or an extended metaphor.  Tactics that can be used in the body of the speech are examples, questions, quotes, suspense, humor, stories, personal examples, statistics, or lists.  If possible, a dramatic climax should occur at the end of the body of the speech.  The conclusion, “Act III”, needs to distill the message in a clear, memorable form.  The difference between listening to a speech and reading text were discussed, and why and how these two forms of communication are very different.  Techniques for writing presentations, objectives, visuals, and editing were discussed.

S. Thompson thanked Anne for her helpful and practical presentation.

General Assembly Meeting

Paley Library Lecture Hall
Tuesday, September 9th, 2003
2:00 P.M.

Present:C. Bell, A. Berhanu, C. Brigham, C.Cunningham, M. Darby, M. Edsall, A. Goldstein, A. Harlow, C. Lang, J. LeBreton, B. Mayes, M.Pastine, F. Rowland, B. Schoolar, S. Stormont, M. Thomas, S. Thompson, A. Vara, C. Weng, T. Whitehead, B. Wright.

Introduction – The Minutes of the General Assembly Meeting of May 13, 2003 were approved as amended.

1. Elections Nominations and Elections Committee. (SamStormont and Carol Brigham). Ballots were collected and nominations from the floor were requested.
2. Congratulations to Carla Davis Cunningham for her promotion from LI to LII.
3. Report of the University Librarian, Maureen Pastine
   1. The Kardon Storage/Retrieval/Access working group continues to work on the project of planning for the moving of volumes to the new storage facility. Jonathan LeBreton and Maureen Pastine are working with Facilities Management and the Design Architect to transform the facility into usable space for library storage. The date for the move has not yet been finalized. Updates will be forthcoming.
   2. Strategic plans for Temple’s schools, colleges, and libraries are due to the Provost by December 31, 2003. The library’s initial draft will be completed prior to November 1st, 2003, in order to gather further input from stakeholders and library personnel prior to completion and submission. This plan is focused around fundraising efforts for the next few years. Members of AAL will be in the working group to assist in completing the final mission, vision, and goals/objectives, as well as the working group for the strategic plan. All library staff will be notified when the results of the external review are known. Information from the LibQUAL survey will also be used in the Strategic Plan.
   3. Subject Specialists are submitting and will be maintaining a list of needed purchases by subject and interdisciplinary areas for any potential new funds that might be made available for acquisitions and access. These lists must include order/purchase information prior to submission to the Chief Collection Development Officer who will then review for final requests with the University Librarian and Jonathan LeBreton before a request is submitted to the Provost and President each year. In future years, this work must be done prior to June 1st at the end of the Fiscal Year.
   4. The Library will be having an all staff meeting to discuss the LibQUAL results and setting priorities for the most crucial needs.
   5. We anticipate another all staff meeting with the Provost and President to discuss the external review once the results are available.
   6. Margaret Jerrido’s recent submission of a grant proposal was approved for approximately $14,000, and Mary Edsall’s recent submission of a grant proposal was approved for approximately $38,700.
   7. The Director of Library Development will be working for 20% of her time with the University Press. The Libraries will be working on collaborative projects with the Press. We are pleased that Alex Holzman is the new director of the University Press.
   9. Department heads have been provided a copy of and the URL for the Association of Research Libraries’ “Research Libraries and the Commitment to Special Collections”, approved by the ARL Board of Directors on February 6th, 2003, and forwarded to the Art Directors on August 7th, 2003.
   10. The University Librarian thanked everyone for another highly productive and successful year.
   11. On September 11th, Dancing in the Stacks, a performance and conference will be held in Paley Library, hosted by the Philadelphia Dance Collection at Temple, Mary Edsall, director.
4. Election results

PARA (Promotion and Regular Appointment) Committee – Aslaku Berhanu, Mark Darby

Continuing Education Committee – Carol Lang

Sam Stormont thanked all those who were willing to run for election for these committees.

1. New Business – Travel Reimbursement Allocation

Jonathan LeBreton introduced a new travel reimbursement allocation proposal which was already proposed to the Administrative Council and to the Steering Committee. Currently there is a three-tiered structure. This structure, by limiting the amount that a librarian can be reimbursed for any one conference, may be discouraging librarians from attending certain conferences depending upon location.The new proposal will set the dollar amount allocation for each librarian for the entire year of $800.

A variation of this proposal would be that, depending upon the percent of underutilization of the funds, an additional reimbursement of $100/year may be offered to those who have not yet achieved regular appointment status as librarians. Any leftover funds would be needed for exceptional circumstances, and for non-librarians (i.e. systems personnel) to attend local seminars, etc.

The Library would still need to know everyone’s conference plans at a set time to plan for the funds. Maureen Pastine encourages all librarians not only to attend, but also to be actively involved in order to build a scholarly reputation. Professional association meetings in a subject area are also considered to be beneficial and relevant.

Librarians could elect to stay with the three-tier system, or to go with the flat allocation.

From the floor it was proposed that participation on a committee or presenting at a conference be justification for funding on a higher level. Another idea proposed was to post organizational committee participation publicly on the library’s website so that librarians would be more visible to other professional associations. Funding for conferences is a particularly important commitment to incoming librarians.

A proposal was made and voted upon that Jonathan will develop a plan, which will be implemented for one year, after which time the matter will be revisited.

Forum

The Librarians adjourned to the Law School Library, where library director, John Necci gave a tour of the recently renovated facility. The Law School Library houses 600,000 volumes on twelve stack levels, and serves 1,000 students and 58 faculty members. Stacks are closed, meaning that the library patron requests to see an item which is then individually retrieved by a staff member. The Summer of 2003 saw Phase I of the library renovation, and Summer 2004 will see Phase II. The tour ended with refreshments in the historic Rawle Reading room. William Rawle was the author of the first commentary on the United States Constitution. In addition, he was founder of the law firm “Rawle and Henderson” in 1785, the firm with the longest continuous practice in the United States.

Chairperson Sandi Thompson thanked John for the fascinating tour, for hosting the Academic Assembly of Librarians forum, and for his gracious hospitality.

Anne Harlow, Recorder — November 10, 2003

Minutes

of the General Assembly Meeting
of March 12, 2002
Conference Room (Room 106)
Tyler Hall, Tyler School of Art

Presiding: Chairperson Cathy Weng, called the meeting to order at 2:10 p.m.

Present: Judy Robison (University of the Arts graduate student intern and a specialist in Book Arts, was a guest of T. Whitehead, with whom she works one day a week); L. Lane; F. Rowland; A. Goldstein; M. Darby; P. Myers; T. Hoskisson; L. El-Zein; I. Bayard; B. Wright; A. Vara (temporary recorder for T. Whitehead); G. Sneff; C. Brigham; S. Thompson; L. Cotilla; C. Cunningham; C. Lang (also reporting for the University Librarian, Maureen Pastine) and guest Jeanne Pond (University Consultant).

Business Meeting

1. Minutes of January 2002 meetings (8 Jan. and 14 Jan.) approved as forwarded by the recorder, T. Whitehead.
2. University Librarian’s Report (Lang for Pastine)
   1. Boris Teske was selected as a participant in the ACRL Information Literacy Immersion, Track II Librarian as Program Developer for the summer 2002 program in Colorado. Only 90 participants were selected.
   2. Carol Lang has oversight for the Libraries’ participation in the Association of Research Libraries’ LibQUAL + (quality service and outcomes assessment of services) program, beginning this semester. Staff at all levels will be involved.
   3. Carol Bell, Head, Acquisitions Department, begins Monday, March 18, 2002.
   4. There will be an all-staff meeting to be held in early June. Planning being done by the Staff Recognition Award Committee.
   5. Contract renewals submitted to the Provost’s Office December 7, 2001; have been approved by the Provost.
   6. The Merit Committee has submitted merit recommendations to me. I have completed a draft response to these. The final copy will be submitted to the Merit Committee and to the Provost’s Office this week or next.
   7. Mary Edsall, Luke Kahlich, and I will submit a Dance Advance (Pew Foundation) grant by March 20, 2002 for the Philadelphia Dance Collection (under the supervision of Mary Edsall as part of the Special Collections Department). The Collection is to be located in Paley Library, second floor. Mary’s office is room 216 Paley.
   8. Mary Edsall, Luke Kahlich (Chair, Dance Department), and I have submitted a proposal to the Delmas Foundation for the Philadelphia Dance Collection.
   9. The science and engineering and architecture librarians, Frank Immler, HSC Librarians and others from HSC, Ken Soprano (Acting vice Provost for Research), and I have met once with a number of Deans and faculty in the sciences regarding science serials. A follow-up is scheduled for this Friday (March 15th), afternoon.
   10. Technology fees for this year have been approved for the Schools and Colleges and the Libraries. The Libraries will be receiving funds for replacement of a number of laptop PC’s.

1. LibQual+ report (Lang)

LibQual+ is a joint research and development project of Texas A&M and ARL whose purpose is to define and measure service quality across research libraries initially and all post-secondary libraries eventually. Paley will be taking part in this project from April 1-April 14th with regard to the use of library by means of user surveys. Three dedicated listservs will be set up for this survey. A series of twenty-four questions will be addressed by three different levels of users: 900 students; 600 faculty; 600 graduate students. The general purpose of the survey is to identify strengths and deficits across the dimensions of library service quality.

1. In addition, the survey is to place a local library’s results in a context with that of other libraries: that is, it will enable administrators to understand the delivery of service quality by a peer perspective. The survey will also allow administrators to identify the best practices among those in the sample, and how similar institutions have more effectively satisfied user expectations.

   Carol Lang will come to departmental meetings to further explain and to get librarians to participate in this crucial survey and evaluate its results before sending them off.

1. Temple Centers and Institutes Research Project (Weng)

This was a measure to identify and obtain information on the many Centers and Institutes at Temple University. There are over fifty such organizations on the various campuses of the University. Carol Harris and Tom Whitehead have gotten together an initial working list of these groups. This list with information on name of the institute/center, its activities, its resources and availability to them, staff, website if any, location, etc. was distributed to the membership for discussion and to determine if the AAL should further work and develop this list of ‘hybrid’ organizations. One important comment by a member (IB) suggested that the Provost at present is reviewing these Centers and Institutes, to evaluate if they are to continue and whether they are to be funded in some manner. Some of the organizations have one person-a faculty member who is the head/director/acting director/etc.-are they worth being under the aegis of Temple University. The Assembly decided to wait until at least the fall (2002) whether to initiate a research project about the Centers/Institutes-until after the Provost’s Office had investigated them.

Sandi Thompson had prepared a sample of the information for the Center for Sustainable Communities (Ambler), filling in Name, Purpose, Address, Staff, Activities, Resources and availability, and Other information of direct interest to the Library.

1. Proposed revision of Process of Contract Renewal, Regular Appointment and Promotion (Weng)

Revised document on Promotion and Regular Appointment Committee-Policies and Procedures, was distributed previously by Mark Darby. Several changes had been made and these are to be ratified at the next Assembly meeting [May]. Revisions are in bold type.

Forum

Temple Fine Arts Collection
Jeanne C. Pond, Consultant for Temple University Art Collection, was hired by the University to develop a collection management system for the fine arts examples found (or hidden) throughout the University. She presented an interesting overview of her work in accounting for, and physically locating, pieces of art-paintings, sculpture, and rare materials in Special Collections for example. Thus far, in her six months of searching, one day a week, she has inventoried over 700 items that require a fine arts organized collection scheme. She has digitally photographed representative items of this somewhat renegade collection, and passed around a laminated loose-leaf book of these images. She hopes to list all items eventually in a software package: “PastPerfect.”

Many art items were stored in closets, warehouses of the University, and other ‘fugitive’ locations, such as the Sjostrom Building (10th Street and C.B. Moore Ave.)

Following the inventory, evaluation of the art pieces will ensue. Ms. Pond alerted all of us to let her know, through the Dean of Tyler School of Art, or through the Head, Special Collections Department, of any art items that we come across in storage spaces or any unusual locations. No one in the University Administration seemed to be aware of the present treasures of art we have right here in our own ‘Acres of Diamonds’.

Al Vara recording with revisions by T. Whitehead

General Assembly Meetings

8 January 2002 and 14 January 2002
MINUTES

Chairperson Cathy Weng called meeting on 8 January 2002 to order at 2:10.

Business meeting:

Minutes of the Assembly meeting of November 13, 2001 were approved as distributed by e-mail to the members.

Introductions: A. Vara introduced Mary Edsall to the Assembly (Part-time, temporary Archivist/Curator of the Philadelphia Dance Archive program. She is a Librarian and currently a PhD candidate in Dance at Temple. She is also currently the CORD President – Congress on Research and Dance).

Also introduced were three new Drexel Interns:

• Anastasia Karel – Special Collections/Contemporary Culture
• Amy Vaccarella – Access Services and
• Mark Werner – Systems

Report of the University Librarian M. Pastine:

The Collection Management issue on which many here are responsible for is nearing completion and may well be out in February.

The Emily Norwick Charitable Trust Fund of $99,000 will be used to name our user education/information literacy program and to establish an exhibit space on the first floor of Paley Library (with some focus on images of women in various professions and purchase of books by and about women). Task forces from ADC will be working on these. Martha Henderson and Byron Mayes are co-chairing the first and Margaret Jerrido is chairing the second. If you have any ideas for them, please contact them directly.

Robert Harting and Dave Synder, from the Development Office and Stuart Sullivan, Vice President for Development and Alumni Affairs, have been meeting with us in relation to development and outreach efforts. They are adding to information that we have provided them on library donors, along with a listing of endowments in support of the library. They hope soon to designate a particular development person to work with the libraries on fundraising.

Concetta Stewart, Dean of the School of Communications and Theater, has been appointed to chair a Provost’s Technology Committee. I am one of the members of the Committee. It met for the first time on December 12, 2001. One of its first tasks is to review the priorities of each of the tech Plans submitted for this year. Its final report to the Provost is due on February 2, 2002.

Boris Teske has applied for the ACRL Information Literacy Immersion, Track II Librarian as Program Developer for the summer 2002 program in Colorado. Only 90 participants will be selected.

Carol Lang is preparing the final paperwork for our libraries’ participation in the Association of Research Libraries’ LibQUAL+ (quality service and outcomes assessment of services) program, beginning next semester. Staff at all levels will be involved.

Contract renewals have been submitted to the Provost’s Office in a timely manner. PARA met their deadline with me and I met mine for submitting the materials to the Provost’s Office. We have not yet received a response from the Provost’s Office.

Carol Bell, Head, Acquisitions Department, begins on March 20, 2002.

We will be setting up an all-staff meeting to be held some time after ALA, and hopefully with the new Provost, Ira Schwartz, visiting us.

AAL Faculty Senate Representative report: S. Stormont gave a brief report on the Senate in which the main topic of discussion has been the ten-year review process which President Adamany wants to see revised.

Temple Centers & Institutes Research Project: T. Whitehead presented to the Assembly that which he previously outlined to the Steering Committee: that it may be worthwhile for the librarians to gather more information concerning the variety of “centers” and “institutes” throughout the University. At least for the public service needs of the library, he noted, information on the services, data bases, archives and libraries, and activities of these centers, beyond what is now known, would be beneficial positively as well as avoiding the numerous queries received which are not answered or answered only after a day or so of campus research. Acknowledging that more information has been getting onto Temple web pages he and the Steering Committee are binging up the topic for discussion in the Assembly. During the introduction and discussion a sample list of centers and information was displayed, as well as a sample data entry form for center investigation.

Following discussion enough interest was shown to continue considering the proposal. Whitehead was asked to distribute the preliminary alphabetical list and a revised list arranged by discipline. Final discussion will be held at the March meeting.

Questions raised during the discussion included responsibility for the list, updating a list once completed, definitions, University guidelines and definitions on centers, etc.

Proposed revision of By Laws: C. Weng led a discussion on the proposed AAL By Law changes necessitated by the requirement of the University President for each School of the University to present its By Laws this Spring for Presidential and Trustee review and approval process. C. Weng noted that the changes were not substantial, correcting inconsistencies, updating titles, correcting grammar, etc. It was proposed to be consistent in the naming of standing committees by changing three of them to end with “Committee” rather than start with “Committee on”.

During discussion two or three minor word changes were incorporated into the proposed By Laws (adding “each”, taking out “for”) and changing “Nominating and Elections Committee” to “Nominations and Elections Committee”.

Voting on the By Law revisions would be scheduled at the next, March, meeting of the Assembly. M. Pastine noted her concern for earlier submission to the President and following discussion L. Lane made a motion, seconded by M. Jerrido:

“I make a motion that the Assembly holds a special meeting next week.”

It was agreed that having a full Assembly meeting the following week would allow for voting on the By Law changes. The Motion was approved by a hand vote.

Chair C. Weng immediately called for a meeting of the Assembly to take place on Monday, January 14th, 2002, at 2:00 p.m. for the purpose of voting on the By Laws revision. This ended the business meeting of the Assembly.

Program:

At 3:20 p.m. Penelope Myers, Access Services, presented a program with slides on PALCI (Pennsylvania Academic Library Connection Initiative). She gave a history of PALCI since its initiation in 1996 and its successful programs in the past five years. She described the on-site borrowing program for faculty, the reciprocal photocopy agreement, the PALCI hotlink on Paley’s home page, and the Virtual Union Catalog. The slides gave particular and in depth statistics on lending and borrowing trends over the years by different libraries and types of libraries. She accepted and answered questions from the floor.

The Program and the Assembly meeting ended at 4:10 p.m.

Chairperson C. Weng called meeting on January 14, 2002 to order at 2:10 p.m. with one agenda item: voting on the proposed revisions to the AAL By Laws.

19 members of the Assembly attended, two more than required for a quorum and official Assembly meeting.

C. Weng called for a hand vote on the proposed revision/emendations to By Laws of the Academic Assembly of Librarians: 19 for acceptance, 0 against acceptance (unanimous).

The meeting was adjourned at 2:15 p.m. with thanks from the Chair.

Whitehead, Recorder
Attachment: By Laws of the Assembly, amended 2002.

General Assembly Meeting Minutes

13 November 2001

Meeting was called to order at 2:10 by Chairperson Cathy Weng.

Business meeting:

Minutes of the Assembly meeting of September 2001 were approved with one addition to the attendance list.

New Librarian to Temple: A. Vara introduced Molly Thomas, Electronic Resources Librarian.

Report of the University Librarian M. Pastine:

1. Mary Edsall began her work on October 1, 2001 for the Philadelphia Dance Archive, a collaborative libraries/university/community project. Mary’s title is Curator/Archivist. She is in a temporary part time position through July 31, 2001.

   We will be submitting a proposal to Dance Advance for funding, including permanent staffing for the position, along with other funding needs. As a temporary staff member, she is not a member of AAL, although she does have a library degree. May want to consider inviting her as guest to general assembly meetings however.

2. The Libraries/Press Executive Board’s second meeting took place on Monday morning, September 24, 2001. We brainstormed ideas for networking, building contacts for fundraising for priority projects. Several member of the board have contacted us since on areas that they would like to work on and some further ideas for contacts.
3. Highlights of the October 16-20 139 ARL Membership Meeting:
   • Plenary discussion on the ARL Statistics Measurements Committee on the Preliminary Findings of the ARL E-Metrics Project to obtain improved and expanded data on electronic resources and services. This Phase II project is an effort to explore the feasibility of defining and collecting data on the use and value of electronic resources. A group of 24 ARL libraries funded and are participating in a study to end on December 2001. The report recommends 16 network statistics and 3 performance measures; the collaborative efforts need to establish with the publishing and vendor community to support reliable and ongoing production of measures related to database use, users, and services; the value of these electronic resources and services to our community of scholars, faculty, students, as well as to the unidentified users who are accessing research library and university resources from around the globe. They have found that electronic resources from 1992-93 were 3.6% of the libraries’ budget and in 1999/00 12.9%. concentration on vendor statistics are from 12 vendors: Academic Press/IDEAL, Elsevier, Lexis/Nexis, OVID, Bell & Howell, Gale Group, ISI, netLibrary, Silver Platter, EBSCO, JSTOR and OCLS/FirstSearch. Key issues are related to acquisitions, accounting and cataloging systems not set up to support data collection; prescribed definitions and procedures are not compatible with local practices; and varying levels of resources are available to support data collection in libraries. Data elements tested are vendors, number of log-ins (sessions), number of queries (searches), items examined, and number of virtual visits to resources. The reliability of data by vendors is unclear. The focus is on high impact databases. They plan another pilot with more volunteers, along with the existing 24 libraries. They are counting consortia statistics the same as those paid for by individual libraries. The assignment of staff may be more important than the number of transactions.
   • The Scholarly Communication Committee requested approval of establishing an International Scholarly Communications alliance with international organizations (a virtual alliance). This was approved. This will not be a part of IFLA. There was discussion of the public library of science of free and unrestricted access to scientific literature and a similar library for social sciences and humanities library open archive. There was a discussion of the role of SPARC, particularly the European SPARC Initiative interested in Open Archives and the planning of a  Japan SPARC Open Archives.
   • There was a discussion on how the U.S. Copyright Office has not done the library community any favors – i.e. standards developed in digital rights movement is alarming – moving in the direction of patent law. There was focus on looking at models that provide free literature to the public domain. An important question: why are we paying for intellectual property we developed? At what point do we quit sending funds out to commercial publishers and repurpose those monies and get our institutions to understand? How can we keep AAU involved so that our institutions understand the crucial role of University Presses and provide strong subsidies? The AAU president is pushing hard for local recognition of university presses. ARL is setting up a virtual communication network.
   • Internet 2 middleware standards for multimedia is crucial. How will standards affect libraries? This is moving quickly and is closely related to electronic reserves.
   • More and more universities are focusing on being revenue producing – including libraries (often referred to as “Diversified Financial Capacity”). One half of the universities represented at the meeting have been told to be income producing, including the libraries.
   • There is a decline of state support to universities from 23% to 16% thus universities are being forced to create new revenues, including from the intellectual property of faculty. Space and information resources on our campuses are being forced to build new markets. It is predicted that universities will be for profits within 10 years. The risk is high. There will be more commercial partnerships between community and university. We will see many high level reference service models and be doing more grant and other fundraising. It was said that we need to create marketing departments for library products/services.
   • There was lengthy discussion of the place of technology in the libraries and changing position configurations/titles and hiring more non-librarian technical personnel. However, there is a poor pool out there. We need cutting edge thinking on this issue. It was noted many times the importance of middle management and how good it must be. Salaries must be made more competitive. We are losing our own graduates to the corporate world and to the disciplines who want to build their own “cybrarians.” Of the libraries represented there was a 50/50 split on Systems heads being librarians and nonlibrarians.
   • Jerry Campbell spoke about the need for a complex set of digital resources with a “Google” like approach for a super scholars portal. We must be knowledgeable experts with software such as Blackboard.
   • Some concern was expressed with a Council on Library and Information Resources newsletter being sent to our Presidents and Provosts without informing librarians with an implied note not to trust librarians on digital issues. CLIR seems to see themselves as not speaking for librarians but for academe as a whole. This is a concern. All were urged to scale up their digitization projects and not be blind-sighted by CLIR. Some disagreement with this issue – i.e. perceiving CLIR as undermining ARL’s role.
   • From the other representatives it was noted that Temple University librarians were gaining recognition throughout the country via heavy involvement in organizations, which was great to hear.
   011113MP
   (rev.WhAAL)

Continuing Education Committee report (B. Mayes): The first program of the year by the Committee will be on November 27th in the Lecture Hall: “Academic Publishing and the Future of the Book” with guest speaker Charles Ault, Director of Production and Electronic Publishing and Assistant Director of Temple University Press. Also at the meeting Lisa Panzer (Blitman Library) and Brian Schoolar (Zahn Library) will discuss their collections and the services they offer. (Discussion and refreshments). M. Pastine will send us the URL of C. Lynch’s site on e-books for pre-program reading.

PARA Committee update (M. Darby): The Committee has not met yet but has been active in meeting with candidates (currently four). There are more contract renewals coming up in February.

Faculty Senate Library Committee (rep. L. Lane): She attended the first meeting of the Committee on October 1st. Following an overview of the function of the Committee they continued with other concerns and interests: (a) student printers in SICs and in Paley, noting wasted time and wasted paper, and noting that printing across from the Reference Desk is now improved, (b) remote and compact storage problems noting that the Kardon building request for funding was not approved by the University to be passed on to the State Legislature, but approved by the President for partial Library use combined with apartments; noting a second priority on bettering the Traylor building storage reservations on security); and noting the completion of the compact storage shelving for Government Documents on the Paley ground floor, and (c) review and discussion of the success of the library in attracting outside funding and its acceptance of gift materials from the reporting by M. Pastine – of note were the Dance Archive, the $75,000.00 music cataloging grant, the $100,000.00 Norwick gift annuity, and the recently received Daily News Obituary File for Urban Archives. The Committee ended with a discussion of the future goals of the Library.

Steering Committee report (C. Weng): the Committee met in July with the chairs of the AAL standing committees to discuss revising and updating the procedures and guidelines of these committees, to be due to be submitted in March. In October the Committee revised its own Procedures, and they and the Minutes of the Steering Committee will be posted on the Home Page, not distributed. President Adamany has requested each unit of the University to produce, revise, or write its By-Laws for documentation and approval by he and the Board of Trustees. As part of the By-Laws of the University Libraries the Committee has begun revising, if needed, the By-Laws of the Assembly. C. Weng noted that the recent Enhanced College Visit program was very successful, heavily due to the participation of the Librarians.

Program (2:50 p.m.):

VIRTUAL TOUR OF BIBLIOTHECA ALEXANDRINA:

Laila El-Zein presented an illustrated review of the still to be opened Alexandrian Library in Egypt, which captivated the audience. During her May 2001 visit to family in Alexandria she was able to secure a private tour of the Library during which she documented her tour with photographs of the exterior and interior. With a cost now approaching $220 million dollars the library had its groundbreaking in 1995, was expected to open in June 2001 and now has a scheduled April 2002 opening. Designed by a Norwegian firm the building is circular with the entire ceiling glass and is designed to be a national library with an 8 million-volume capacity, in open stacks. It is a seven level or story building with the upper two floors for a School of Information Science. Her pictures vividly captured the reading areas, stack areas, and architecture of the building.

The presentation and the meeting ended at 3:30 p.m.

T. Whitehead, recorder

Agenda:

Meeting called to order at 2:10PM by the Chair: C. Weng

Present: C. Weng, M. Pastine, C. Lang, L. Lane, A Goldstein, C. Cunningham, G. McKinney, El Zein, P. Myers, T. Hoskisson, F. Rowland, J. Schoolar, B. Teske, S. Dreher, B. Wright, J. Chen, A. Vara, S. Stormont, M. Darby, G. Sneff , C. Brigham.

Business

1. Approval of May 2001 Minutes

Assembly approved the Minutes as presented by Thomas Whitehead as they were E-mailed.

2. Introduction of new librarians and IMLS Project Director: Hoskisson, Rowland, Schoolar, Teske, Dreher (Vara) As presented by the Vice-Chair, Vara (copies enclosed if you want the introductions as read to the Assembly)
3. PARA Election (Berhanu)

Berhanu not present: emergency; Ballots distributed by Myers.

4. Report from University Librarian (Pastine)

As presented by the U.L. (See enclosed Report)

5. Discussion of Merit Award Process (Goldstein)

Assembly discussed the topic; Are department heads to be included in the Merit process? The discussion seemed to favor that including department heads would not fulfill their duties (dept. heads) as peers of the librarians applying for merit. Some dept. heads present were for the inclusion, some against. The question will be remanded to the Steering Committee which meets on the 20th of September, room 309, at 2:00PM In addition, the entire the Merit process chronology is being pushed up, i.e., October might be the time when notices go out for those who want to apply. The U.L. has requested that all materials for merit be in her hands by February 15th. This will also be finalized by the Steering Committee on September 15th. It was important that merit is always for the previous fiscal year: for July 1 2000-June 30 2001.

Merit process will include ‘yes’ or ‘no’ as a recommendation from the individual’s department head. Revised forms include a Merit Salary Award Nomination form; AAL Committee on Merit: Guidelines and Procedures form; Clarification of Performance Criteria form; Policy for Merit Awards for Librarians in the University Libraries form; Merit Committee Recommendation form; Merit Salary Award Supervisory Recommendation form. All these provisional forms will be decided at the next Steering Committee meeting, September 20th, 2001, 2:00PM, room 309, Paley Library.
1. Brief announcement of future Assembly Meeting Forum topics (Weng)

Suggestions: PALCI, (other topics encouraged). Also El Zein’s photographic survey of Alexandria to be re-scheduled (tentatively for November)

2. PARA Election result (Berhanu)

Myers reported the results: McKinney and Thompson were elected.

Forum

AAL Homepage Demonstration (Davis Cunningham, Mckinney) This interesting presentation was very well received by the Assembly. Discussion: Does the AAL want the AAL Minutes and other material of the AAL to be available to the entire Temple community? Someone suggested to place a password at this website: ‘http://library.temple.edu/about/aal/’ so to restrict access ALA minutes except to members of the AAL. The Vice-Chair will keep the AAL minutes up to date on the website as well as other changes to the site. [as soon as Phil D’Andrea makes the necessary changes to his, AV’s, computer, and teaches the basics of HTML for editing the AAL page.]

AV/recorder for T.W.

General Assembly Meeting Minutes

May 8, 2001
Paley Library Lecture Hall

Presiding: Carol Lang, Chairperson.

The Minutes of the General Assembly Meeting of March 7, 2001 were approved with one revision.

Report of the University Librarian (M. Pastine):

1. Our Annual Library Staff meeting will occur on Thursday, June 7th from 2:00 – 3:30 p.m. in the Lecture Hall. In addition to the Staff Recognition Award for University Libraries, there will also be such awards for HSC and Law Libraries and possibly CIS. A short video will be shown by Human Resources on quality clientele service with a bit of discussion. The meeting is in June rather than earlier in May as we wanted President Adamany here to respond to questions. He is most willing to get some in advance – send them to me or Carol Lang and we will compile and forward, or just bring them to the meeting and he will respond.
2. I have completed the PARA and the Merit recommendations. I want to say that last year at this time I made a number of recommendations to the Librarians regarding what my expectations were for documentation coming to me, including the past two year’s annual reports, letters of support, the Committee’s documentation (first to me and I give it to Administrative Services when I have completed by reviews), and evaluations from the Department Heads. I also added what I expected beyond the position description, i.e. service / professional / scholarly work with copies demonstrating active participation, copies of publications or book reviews, etc.). And, I asked the librarian to provide the benefits to themselves as well as to the Libraries and the University. I also asked for more than 10 days to respond because April and May are really busy months for me. The majority of the Librarians remembered to do all of this. Thanks so much.
3. I also informed you that we would be getting the Immigration Ship Manifests returned to us. That decision has been changed so we will not get these.
4. I was also hoping that we would get to raise funds for the Baptist Temple for archival and special collections/museum type materials. Although that looked promising for a while, it no longer does – so put your thinking caps on this.
5. We were also just beginning the IMLS project. We are now well underway with another grant – for 2 years – with an extension on the first one. The second one is for $510,000. To see what has been done, check out the URL: diamond.temple.edu:81.
6. The PEW $167,000 grant for the Illuminated Manuscripts of many Philadelphia’s libraries and museums was completed and shown at the Philadelphia Museum of Art. Our Special Collections was part of this.
7. The Ambler and Urban Archives compact storage is completed.
8. The Assistant to the University Librarian, Carol Lang, has been hired and doing really excellent work.
9. The Electronic Reserves module pilot program of Diamond has been underway for some time.
10. The Portable Laptop Program was re-opened in the Tuttleman Learning Center with a new hire, Dawn Bloomer, who is doing great.
11. The Greenstein Celebration has not yet occurred but processing will be completed this summer.
12. We celebrated the dedication of the Libraries/Computer Labs in both Norris Home Project and the Dunbar School.
13. We celebrated our two millionth volume.
14. We began a collaborative working relationship with the University Press, with them now reporting to the Libraries.
15. We brought up our portion of the PALCI URSA union catalog.
16. We received $75,000 from Access PA to catalog selected music materials scattered throughout the many buildings of the School of Music and will begin working on this soon.
17. We had the first meeting of the Libraries/University Press Executive Board to assist with advancement and development projects.
18. We began an Internship program.
19. We completed a systems audit. Dept. Heads have the documents.
20. We are hoping to fill 17 library positions. (Question: hiring freeze?)
21. We are still awaiting an answer to our request for permission to continue to proceed on hiring processes already started.
22. It is time now to review our Strategic Plan for the next year’s priorities. For budget planning purposes, our priorities will include User Education and bridging the gap between K-12 and the community; subject specialists liaison work with faculty; marketing and visibility and continuing systems work in the Libraries.

Merit Committee Issues (C. Lang): C. Lang noted that the University administration has begun to require more information and stricter procedures documentation with faculty merit, promotion and tenure considerations and M. Pastine believes that the same increased documentation and form will very probably be carried over to librarians’ PARA and Merit procedures: more librarian annual reports (achievements, problems, evaluative reviews of supervisors – usually by department heads). Clear and detailed checklists need to be prepared and the librarians’ Merit procedures need review. Andrea Goldstein will chair a task force to look into Merit guidelines, checklists, instructions, etc. M. Pastine noted that we don’t know for sure if Adamany will give as much attention to librarians as to faculty but he certainly might.

M. Darby noted his concern on peer review and department heads and philosophy on staff. Regarding both Merit and PARA he has concerns on the paperwork, on formal reviews of two-week old new staff, and he asks the all librarians read the TAUP contract and the procedures currently used in these programs and be ready to understand it all for any future paper changes and task forces.

Congratulations were given to Mark for his recent collective bargaining contributions for both faculty and librarians. M. Pastine noted that salaries for librarians is a hot topic of the ALA President, and that she is on the ALA Committee for Status of Librarians. And, she reminds all to “keep that special personal file!”

Assembly Elections (A. Goldstein, A. Berhanu): Ballot counting was initiated at this stage of the meeting, resulting later in the meeting with the report that there were two tie votes (for Chairperson-elect and for one of the Selection and Appointment Committee positions), and that a revote on these two was required. The final results were later reported by the Nominations and Elections Committee as:

• Vice Chairperson/Chairperson-elect: Al Vara
• Steering Committee, Member-at-large: Andrea Goldstein
• Continuing Education Committee: Carla Davis Cunningham, 2 years
• Anne Harlow, 1 year
• Faculty Senate Library Committee Rep.: Laura Lane
• Nominations and Elections Committee: Penelope Myers
• Selection and Appointment Committee: Carol Brigham
• Rick Lezenby

AAL Web Page Task Force Update (C. Weng):

At the March General Assembly meeting at Ambler C. Cunningham and J. Chen were selected to work on the proposed AAL web page with C. Weng as Chair of the Task Force. Later G. McKinney was recruited to the membership.

The Task Force meet on March 22nd and:

discussed and considered, without finalization, materials which should or could be on the site: all important AAL documents, hyper-interlinked (By-laws, members and addresses, meeting schedules (Assembly and Steering Committee), meeting minutes of Assembly and Steering Committee (5-year archive), standing committee annual reports and procedures, committee charges, committee members and terms of service.

agreed on assignments for the members of the Task Force: Carla and Cathy to begin collecting the documents from office holders, committees, past presidents, archives in Templana, and wherever else possible; Jeanne and Greg to work on design and the technical work.

planned a tentative time table: by the end of May have all documents collected and scanned, by mid-July have the majority of documents physically loaded on the web, and use August for the tweaking and cleaning up of the site.

C. Weng noted that already the Task Force has noted that there are, surprisingly for the past five years, missing annual reports and minutes.

C. Lang asked how the Task Force wanted the annual reports due today to be delivered. C. Weng will accept them now in any form but in the future they should be sent electronically. M. Pastine reminded the Task Force to check with the Library’s Webmaster (P. D’Andrea) to be sure all is up to par with Systems.

It was questioned whether the site would be restricted. C. Weng said that the thoughts of the Task Force so far were for openness. There was discussion on this and the T.F. will consider this further – perhaps may recommend restricting to the campus.

Annual Reports

C. Lang reported on the Steering Committee noting the Committee’s putting more programming into the General Assembly meetings, especially on professional issues and development. She reviewed the Assembly meetings and the programs the Steering Committee encouraged.

PARA was noted as handling four candidates during the year.

G. Sneff reported for the Continuing Education Committee, which held two programs during the year, their JSTOR meeting with a JSTOR guest and their “Brown Bag/Sharing of Meeting Information” meeting.

T. Whitehead reported on the meetings of the Faculty Senate Library Committee.

S. Stormont reported on his representation to the Faculty Senate and noted that in the future he would forward meeting minutes to all librarians.

C. Weng reported for the Selection and Appointment Committee and the ten searches they had participated in during the year (Copy Cat Coordinator, Database Manager, User Education and Social Sciences librarians, Access Services Librarian and Electronic Resources Cataloger, Science Librarian, Reference Arts & Humanities, Government Documents, and Systems librarians.

This ended the Business Section of the meeting, immediately followed by the topical program: the Intern Panel:

The three remaining graduate library interns, Maura Boyle, Susan Dreher, and Bob Hull each spoke to the Assembly, noting their backgrounds, their daily work here, their feelings and what they felt they had learned during their experience at Temple. One noted comment: “Everyone at Temple was willing to share information”. In response to “Would you recommend Temple?” all three resoundingly answered “Yes”! They were thanked by the Assembly for their work and for helping us learn from them and their up-to-date educational work. Susan asked if it were possible that interns could be put on the library staff e-mail list, and Bob, well Bob interested everyone with a recommendation for reading: What Do You Want to do When You Grow Up? Dorothy Cantor and Andrea Thompson. Little Brown, 2000.

The General Assembly ended at 3:45 following applause for the interns and applause for Carol Lang and her Chairpersonship during 2000-2001.

T. Whitehead,
Recorder