The authors of this study performed a content analysis on one year of TikTok and Instagram posts by 18 highly marketable NCAA athletes. They examined differences by platform, gender, and content type. They found that male athletes posted more “frontstage athletic performance” and “backstage marketable lifestyle” content, and that their female counterparts posted more “backstage attractive appearance” content which received the highest engagement found in the study. They also found that “frontstage” athletic content was more commonly posted to Instagram, while “backstage” content was more commonly posted to TikTok. This study is rooted in Goffman’s (1959) self-presentation theory, which explains how individuals present themselves and regulate the impressions others have of them.
This article gives a lot of insight about how athletes utilize social media, particularly how college athletes utilize social media in the era of NIL. The right of college athletes to profit off their name, image, and likeness is still a relatively new phenomenon, and social media is a powerful tool for athletes to seize this opportunity. The gender differences seen in this study reinforce traditional gender norms, where male athletes posted more athletic performance content and female athletes posted more content promoting their physical appearance. It appears that audience wants male athletes to be athletes and female athletes to be models. This opens an interesting question: are the athletes posting the content promoting their preferred image or their followers’ preferred image? Are these athletes happy and content with their social media personas? I think a study of a similar nature would be particularly interesting to see five years from now, as anecdotally we have already seen the pendulum swing, with female athletes like Caitlin Clark (WNBA) rising to prominence posting primarily “frontstage” athletic performance content and male athletes like Jared McCain (NBA) posting primarily “backstage” content.
The feedback I received on my preproduction binder was incredibly valuable. Matt helped me to pay more consideration to the role of social media managers in professional sports, as well as the idea of analyzing athlete public personas in the pre-social media world. Calvin gave me great feedback from a technical standpoint for logistics of recording my interviews, including camera and microphone configuration, as well as offering his help with audio skills and intro/outro music.
For my proof of concept, I do not believe I am quite ready to conduct my first interview, so I will be conducting a “dry run” for my interviews. I will conduct two mock interviews with a friend or classmate, ensuring my technical capabilities to record quality video and audio. One interview will be on-camera using lavalier mics and the other will be a recorded Zoom interview.
Wanzer, C. V., Pfender, E. J., Travis, N. P., & Bleakley, A. (2024). Mapping the field: A content analysis of marketable NCAA athletes’ social media self-presentation. Communication & Sport, 0(0). https://doi-org.libproxy.temple.edu/10.1177/21674795241232404